The South Carolina Statehouse corruption investigation was a probe into unlawful interactions between members of the South Carolina General Assembly, the political firm of Richard Quinn, Sr., and major state institutions and corporations from 2013 to 2021. The influence of Quinn's consulting firm was called the Quinndom. By the end of the investigation, four members of the South Carolina General Assembly were indicted on public corruption charges. This investigation is often considered the most significant political scandal in the history of the state of South Carolina since Operation Lost Trust in 1989. Lost Trust directly influenced the passing of South Carolina's Ethics Reform Act of 1991, and led to the restructuring of the state government in 1993. The investigation raised questions about the effectiveness of that reform in the face of political corruption and dark money influence.
In 2013, a report on the campaign spending of House Speaker Bobby Harrell was submitted to the Attorney General of South Carolina by the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED). Based on this report, a State Grand Jury investigation was initiated, but attorneys for Harrell called for the recusal of Attorney General Alan Wilson. Wilson designated solicitor David Pascoe to act as special prosecutor.
In 2014, Harrell was indicted, removed from office and sentenced after a guilty plea of multiple state ethics law violations. Additional legislators were named in the SLED report, and Pascoe sent a request to the Attorney General for expansion of the corruption probe to include these individuals.
In 2015, almost nine months after Pascoe’s request, the Attorney General communicated to SLED that their report should be sent to Pascoe for determination on how to prosecute.
In 2016, a case initiation form by Pascoe and SLED Chief Mark Keel referred the case to the State Grand Jury. The Attorney General argued that only he as the elected officer could sign the form, and that Pascoe had no standing, and fired Pascoe from the case. In response, Pascoe petitioned the South Carolina Supreme Court calling for a decision on his vested authority to move forward with the investigation. On June 16, the case was heard before the Supreme Court, Pascoe arguing his own case. The Court ruled in favor of Pascoe, giving him “full authority to act as the Attorney General for purposes of the investigation.” From there, members of the State Grand Jury were selected and the investigation proceeded.
Mandy Powers Norrell and Gary Clary, former members of the South Carolina House of Representatives, introduced a campaign finance and ethics reform bill in January 2017. The bill had a hearing by the House Judiciary Committee, but was not advanced.
In October 2018, South Carolina Circuit Court Judge Clifton Newman ruled that the request to publish the State Grand Jury Report on the public corruption investigation should be approved. The State newspaper joined Pascoe in arguing before the court that the report should be made public.
Governor Henry McMaster was among other public officials and corporate heads who contracted with Richard Quinn's consulting business. While he was not implicated in the corruption probe, McMaster was not immediately able to appoint replacements to retiring board members of the South Carolina Ports Authority (SCPA). The authority also contracted with Richard Quinn. After SCPA ended their contracts with Quinn, the state legislature allowed the appointments to go forward. McMaster subsequently ended his contract with Quinn.
Five corporations — the University of South Carolina, AT&T, SCANA, Palmetto Health, and the South Carolina Alliance for Justice — signed corporate integrity agreements with Pascoe to pay a fine and admit no wrongdoing in exchange for no prosecution.
Owlapps.net - since 2012 - Les chouettes applications du hibou